AZDOC loves to talk about accountability.
They say it like punishment automatically equals responsibility.
It doesn’t.
Arizona Department of Corrections has confused consequence with accountability, and that confusion is one of the main reasons it fails so consistently.
Let’s make this clean and logical.
Accountability Requires Understanding. Punishment Requires Nothing.
Accountability means a person:
-
Understands what they did
-
Understands why they did it
-
Understands the impact
-
Has the tools to do something different next time
Punishment requires none of that.
Punishment only requires power.
AZDOC skips the thinking part and goes straight to consequences. No inquiry. No analysis. No correction of underlying behavior. Just penalties.
That’s not accountability. That’s behavioral suppression.
AZDOC’s Model: Fear First, Growth Never
AZDOC operates on a lazy framework:
Rule broken → punishment issued → problem “solved”
Except it isn’t.
What actually happens is this:
-
People learn how to avoid getting caught
-
People learn how to shut up
-
People learn how to perform compliance
They do not learn how to self-regulate, self-correct, or take internal responsibility.
Fear teaches avoidance.
Accountability teaches ownership.
AZDOC teaches fear.
Punishment Without Tools Guarantees Repeat Behavior
This is basic cause-and-effect.
If you punish behavior without:
-
Teaching alternatives
-
Addressing trauma
-
Treating addiction
-
Regulating the nervous system
You are guaranteeing the behavior returns.
Punishment does not create capacity.
It only exposes the lack of it.
Then AZDOC labels the repeat behavior as proof the person is “incorrigible,” instead of proof the system did nothing to change conditions.
That’s not justice. That’s deflection.
Real Accountability Is Hard. Punishment Is Easy.
Real accountability requires time, effort, and humility.
It requires asking uncomfortable questions:
-
What skills does this person lack?
-
What trauma is driving this behavior?
-
What support is missing?
-
What environment reinforces failure?
Punishment avoids all of that.
You don’t have to understand people to punish them.
You just have to control them.
And AZDOC has chosen control every time.
The Result: People Leave With More Shame, Less Skill
Here’s the outcome AZDOC refuses to own:
People leave prison knowing what not to do — but with no idea how to do better.
They leave with:
-
More shame
-
Less trust
-
Worse emotional regulation
-
A deeper “us vs. them” mindset
And then the state pretends to be shocked when accountability doesn’t magically appear on release.
Accountability doesn’t grow in hostile environments.
It grows where people are taught how to carry responsibility without being crushed by it.
Let’s Be Honest About What’s Really Happening
AZDOC uses punishment to:
-
Appear tough
-
Maintain control
-
Avoid reform
-
Shift blame onto individuals
It’s optics. Not outcomes.
If punishment worked, recidivism wouldn’t be a constant.
If accountability were the goal, tools would exist.
They don’t. And that’s not an accident.
Bottom Line — Because This Isn’t Complicated
Punishment without accountability guarantees failure.
Accountability without tools is impossible.
And AZDOC offers punishment instead of both.
Tomorrow, we’re going to talk about how AZDOC treats trauma like defiance — and why that guarantees emotional collapse, not rehabilitation.
This series isn’t here to make anyone comfortable.
It’s here to make the math unavoidable.

Comments
Post a Comment