Once you understand that AZDOC punishes trauma and replaces accountability with punishment, the next failure becomes impossible to ignore. The system doesn’t actually measure rehabilitation at all. It measures obedience—and then pretends the two are the same thing.
Arizona Department of Corrections points to “good behavior” as evidence that its approach works. Fewer write-ups. Fewer incidents. Less visible disruption. On paper, that looks like progress. In reality, it’s just silence under pressure.
Obedience answers a very narrow question: did the person comply? Rehabilitation asks something much harder: can this person function differently when the pressure is gone? AZDOC rarely asks the second question, because obedience is easy to track and rehabilitation isn’t. One fits neatly into reports and metrics. The other requires time, nuance, and an understanding of human behavior that the system has never prioritized.
Inside prison, “good behavior” often has nothing to do with growth. It usually means learning how to stay invisible. People quickly figure out that the safest way to survive is to keep their head down, suppress reactions, avoid attention, and not trust anyone with power over them. That isn’t healing. It’s adaptation to threat. The behavior improves not because the person is healthier, but because the environment is hostile enough to punish authenticity out of them.
The system quietly rewards this. Silence looks like success. Compliance looks like progress. Emotional shutdown looks like stability. But those same traits become liabilities the moment someone is released. Outside of prison, the skills required are the opposite: communication, emotional regulation, decision-making without constant oversight, and the ability to ask for help without fear of punishment. None of those are built through obedience.
This is why so many people leave prison technically “well behaved” but completely unprepared for life without rigid control. The structure disappears overnight, and there’s nothing underneath it. No internal scaffolding. No practiced skills. Just survival habits formed in a coercive environment. When things fall apart, the system calls it personal failure. It isn’t. It’s the predictable result of confusing control with change.
Rehabilitation cannot be forced. It has to be built. It requires safety, repetition, support, and room to make mistakes without being crushed by them. Punishment can enforce rules, but it cannot teach regulation, accountability, or self-awareness. Those are internal processes, and AZDOC has never structured itself to cultivate them.
If obedience were rehabilitation, release wouldn’t be destabilizing. If compliance meant growth, recidivism wouldn’t be a feature of the system. But obedience only works inside the cage. Rehabilitation has to work outside of it.
Until AZDOC understands that difference, the outcome will stay the same—no matter how many rules are enforced or how strictly they’re applied.
Tomorrow, we’re going to talk about how AZDOC confuses structure with support, and why removing structure without ever building capacity sets people up to fail the moment they’re released.
This isn’t outrage.
It’s pattern recognition.
Comments
Post a Comment